<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unreality Music&#187; Natalie Imbruglia blog posts @ Unreality Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://music.unrealitytv.co.uk/tag/natalie-imbruglia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://music.unrealitytv.co.uk</link>
	<description>A blog about current releases, past classics and unsigned talent!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Natalie Imbruglia &#8211; Glorious</title>
		<link>http://music.unrealitytv.co.uk/natalie-imbruglia-glorious/</link>
		<comments>http://music.unrealitytv.co.uk/natalie-imbruglia-glorious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerard McGarry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pop Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singer/Songwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acoustic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natalie Imbruglia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://music.unrealitytv.co.uk/natalie-imbruglia-glorious/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[tags]Natalie Imbruglia, 2007, Acoustic, Reviews[/tags]
 Natalie&#8217;s always excelled at a certain brand of polished acoustic pop music, but she&#8217;s never managed to achieve quite the same heights of success as another Antipodean ex-soap actress I could mention.
Glorious follows in that tradition, with a major marketing push to remind us that 2007 marks Natalie&#8217;s 10th year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:0bba21be-db5f-47e1-8e8a-57de07ed765d" contenteditable="false" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">[tags]Natalie Imbruglia, 2007, Acoustic, Reviews[/tags]</div>
<p><img class="right" height="240" alt="Natalie_Imbruglia" src="http://music.unrealitytv.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/natalie-imbruglia.jpg" width="157" border="0"> Natalie&#8217;s always excelled at a certain brand of polished acoustic pop music, but she&#8217;s never managed to achieve quite the same heights of success as another Antipodean ex-soap actress I could mention.</p>
<p><em>Glorious</em> follows in that tradition, with a major marketing push to remind us that 2007 marks Natalie&#8217;s 10th year as a minor league pop star. I read this quotable quote from Imbruglia over <a href="http://popmusickingdom.blogspot.com/2007/07/new-song-natalie-imbruglia-glorious.html">on Pop Music Kingdom</a>:</p>
<p><span id="more-227"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>?I have been busy for the last 12 months writing and recording my 4th album, and started reflecting on the past 10 years and all the fond memories I have of that time.? Natalie says. ?So, I wanted to put out this singles collection to celebrate it.?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Permit me to pour scorn over those remarks. You wanted to celebrate your 10 years by releasing a greatest hits package so that your fan club could spend more money on you? Gee, that&#8217;s thoughtful. Smacks of duplicity, Miss Imbruglia.</p>
<p>Especially considering that, since <em>Torn</em>, most of Natalie&#8217;s tracks have blended together into some sort of vacuous, bland haze. Yes, she looks great as ever (despite a dodgy bob that makes her head look slightly disconnected from her body), and <em>Glorious</em> is a fairly upbeat, accessible tune. But it&#8217;s not memorable at all. For me, Natalie&#8217;s relevance in pop music started and ended with <em>Torn</em> and to still be churning out this kind of material 10 years later smacks of laziness and lack of artistic growth. I had such high hopes.</p>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fp3ehUd2odE" width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://music.unrealitytv.co.uk/natalie-imbruglia-glorious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
